Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/FreplySpang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MarkSweep (talk | contribs) at 00:22, 24 May 2005 (→‎[[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]]: support). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Vote here (3/0/0) ending 00:10 May 31 2005 (UTC)

FreplySpang has been around for 3 months and has accumulated nearly 3000 edits. Everything suggests she would make a wonderful admin. Looking at her talk page, it's filled with praise Thanks for your swift response to his edits. (in response to a POV pusher), i was nearly put off... but you were so nice about it i think i'll stick around. :-) (in response to notification of posting copyvio material), and F*** off you motherf***ing douchebag (from a vandal). Her contributions cover a wide area and she's active in both the article space and the Wikipedia: space. She's very active in vandal fighting and is always civil and courteous, even to the most offensive of vandals. Additionally, on a personal note, she's been a lot of help in testing out my vandal fighting program and has given me lots of good feedback on it. CryptoDerk 00:08, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

Candidate please indicate acceptance of the nomination here

(blush) I accept. Thanks, CryptoDerk! FreplySpang (talk) 00:12, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. CryptoDerk 00:08, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Definitely: trustworthy, reasonable, and would benefit from having the mop and bucket. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:17, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support. CryptoDerk basically explained my opinions about her. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:21, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support. --MarkSweep 00:22, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A.